How Much is that birdy in your garden? Part II
It is impossible to value nature, it is too complex. Therefore the only practical way to value nature is to charge those who use it, and abuse it, an annual rent. This rent is to paid to the government in lieu of other taxes and will make natural resource destruction expensive and people will naturally seek to reduce their use of land and natural resources, so they can avoid the rental charge. It must be stressed that this tax is instead of other taxes, and total tax take would remain the same. It would be also much more progressive in that the poor would pay less and tax dodgers could not avoid it!
Nature’s value to man is endless and should belong to every human in equal measure. The best way to express this is to charge a tax equal to the rent a landowner would charge for the use of their land or the fee to extract minerals etc. There are other natural rents that could be charged such as water extraction and use of electromagnetic spectrum.
This income would then form the basis of all Government revenue, all other taxes such as income tax, National Insurance, Vat etc. should be abolished .
Government could vary the tax on some natural resources in line with the ‘externalities’ a word economists use to express the wider problems to society, loss of wildlife, pollution etc. This would have the effect of shaping public use of a natural resource to become more efficient or find alternatives. Therefore oil could attract a great tax than less polluting natural gas. Land held as nature reserves our as extensive grazing in perpetuity would be less valuable and as such attract little or no tax. Foreign goods could have a charge put on them for their resource use to equalise tax on imported and exported goods.
To understand Georgist economics you should watch some of Fred Harrison’s other films or read his books:
Ricardo’s law:
Comments
Post a Comment