Wildlife charities promoting child poverty part II
Any house building would help poor people, it is a national
disgrace that we are building so few homes in the UK. But as you say there are
no real planning proposals to redress this, and the Tory planning changes are a
travesty that will maximise income to landowners and city spivs while
minimising the social benefit that home building brings.
I still doubt it will have any real structural difference to
biodiversity in the UK, changes in agriculture are at least 100 times more
important than house building. I still think that this is not well understood
by the general population and most people operate on a completely false set of
assumptions that house building is a major factor in wildlife loss. Simplistic
campaigns and some of the rhetoric on the 38 degrees site play into this
popular misconception.
I have grave concerns that the popularity whipped up by all
sections of the media are more do to with present day home owners pulling up
their ladder of privilege to protect their capital value. I have been
very guilty of using house building as a bogyman in my own past campaigns and
deeply regret it, I used this for one of my most popular marketing campaigns
while at Kent Wildlife Trust. Unfortunately this diverted attention from the
real wildlife calamity that was befalling the county due to the changes
in farming and land use such as drainage and flood defences.
This proposal, just like the forestry proposal, shows just how
much private interests have wholly captured public policy formation, and on
that front I am a huge supporter of the work of 38degrees in being the biggest
facilitator of poplar opinion to counter this trend.
Comments
Post a Comment